I read a Harvard Business Review article this week entitled The Folly of Stretch Goals by Daniel Markovitz. In his piece, Daniel argues that stretch goals can be “terribly demotivating,” that they “foster unethical behavior,” and “lead to excessive risk taking.”
I then read a couple dozen, of the nearly 300 responses, and feel that one key consideration is wholly absent with regards to the very essence and reason to stand firmly in support of stretch goals and in my opinion, I couldn’t disagree any more with his conclusion.
A stretch goal, simply put, is designed to challenge the way people think – period. Whether you are an individual, a small group, or a large organization, in order to create a disruptive environment, to achieve quantum change, you have to be mentally challenged in order shift the way you think. And, in order to change the way people think, you have to start with bold questions and establishing the type of expectations that cannot be achieved by thinking about and doing the things you have always done.
Consider the following examples of stretch goals:
Individual Achievement:
1) Dean Karnasas: for charity, ran 200 miles, non-stop, and then tagged on an additional marathon at the end of a run for a total of 226.2 miles of nonstop running – are you kidding me!
2) Scott Rigsby: despite losing both legs and over a decade of drugs, alcohol, and severe depression, he did the “Unthinkable” and set a stretch goal of being the first double amputee to complete an Ironman on prosthetics. And, On October 10, 2011- Scott Rigsby crossed the finish line at the 2011 Ford Ironman World Championship in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii! All I can say is Respect!
3) Gandhi – need I say more?
Team Achievement:
1) The 1980 US Hockey Team (a group of collegiate athletes) winning the Gold Medal
2) Hoosiers
Government:
1) JFK boldly stating that we would be the first nation to put a man on the moon by the end of the decade “…not because it is easy, but because it is hard…”
2) Our Founding Fathers – how dare they think such thoughts! The shear audacity of their quest to become the United States!
TED Talks
1) For those of you that are not aware of TED Talk’s, their mission statement starts with: “We believe passionately in the power of ideas to change attitudes, lives and ultimately, the world.”
Clearly, if the intentions of setting a stretch goal are for monetary reasons only, then the point of establishing a stretch goal is completely missed and the entire argument of this Daniel’s article becomes a moot point.
Something that I personally believe, with passion, is that poeople inherently want to be a part of something grand and noble. If the leadership of an organization can clearly articulate, not only what the stretch goal is, but, more importantly, the reason for the stretch goal, then the idea becomes an integral part of the organizations culture. This simple concept can be applied whether it’s self-leadership, a team leader, or a CEO of a global corporation.
Another way to look at this, it’s not about the stretch goal. Ultimately, it’s all about the reason for the goal and if the reason is inherently noble in nature, the likelihood of achieving that vision increases by an order of magnitude in the hearts, minds, and souls of the people involved.
And what if you don’t hit your stretch goal? Well, as far as I’m concerned, falling a little short of an audacious goal is a hell of a lot better than falling short of tiny mile stone – wouldn’t you agree? Like the saying goes, if you aim for the stars, you might hit the moon and I think that is fantastic when compared to the alternative!